The Supreme Court has deferred the scientific survey, including carbon dating, of an alleged Shivling which was reportedly found at the Gyanvapi complex in Varanasi during a videographic survey last year.
The Supreme Court said that since the implications of the Allahabad High Court order that allowed carbon dating of the alleged Shivling merit closer scrutiny, the implementation of the directions concerned in the order shall stand deferred till the next date.
The carbon dating of the “Shivling” was suspended by a bench consisting of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices PS Narasimha, and KV Viswanathan. The bench stated that the execution of the Allahabad High Court’s order’s directives will be postponed till the next hearing date.
“Since the implications of the impugned order merit closet scrutiny, the implementation of the directions concerned in the order shall stand deferred till the next date,” the Supreme Court said in its order.
The Gyanvapi mosque management committee had appealed against the Allahabad High Court’s recent ruling directing ASI to conduct a scientific inquiry to establish the age of the Shivling, and the Supreme Court also served notice on the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh government in this regard.
On May 12, the Allahabad High Court had ordered the authorities to determine the age of the structure claimed to be a Shivling in the Gyanvapi complex in Varanasi using modern technology.
It set aside an October 14 order of the Varanasi District Court that rejected a plea for scientific investigation, including carbon dating, of the structure found in May 2022 during a court-mandated survey of the Gyanvapi complex located next to the Kashi Vishwanath temple.
The high court ordered authorities to ensure no harm is done to the structure, the Hindu petitioners claim is a Shivling. The mosque authorities say it is part of a fountain in the ‘wazu khana’, where ablutions are performed before namaz.
Justice Arvind Kumar Mishra passed the order on a revision petition filed by Laxmi Devi and three others challenging the Varanasi court order.
The court had obtained a report from various institutions, including the IITs in Kanpur and Roorkee and Birbal Sahni Institute of Lucknow, before ordering the authorities to determine the age of the structure.
The report says direct dating of the structure is not possible and the age can be ascertained with proxy dating of materials, which can “correlate with the establishment of the lingam if there is any”.
“This needs a thorough study of the materials surrounding the lingam,” it adds.
The report also suggests the dating of some organic materials below the surface can ascertain the age but it needs to be established that they are related to the structure.
The court considered the suggestions of Prof Javed N Malik of the Department of Earth Sciences, IIT Kanpur.
Prof Malik suggested that to understand the buried material and structure it would be essential to undertake a detailed subsurface survey through Ground Penetrating Radar (GRP). This will be helpful in identifying the remains of the ancient structures buried if any at the site, he added.
The high court directed the Varanasi district judge to proceed, in accordance with the law, on the application by the Hindu worshippers’ for conducting a scientific probe of the Shivling, paving the way for determining the age of the structure.
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) in its 52-page report had given the opinion that the age of the structure can be determined through scientific method without causing any harm to the structure. Its opinion was based on studies conducted by IIT Kanpur, IIT Roorkee, Birbal Sahni Institute, Lucknow, and one more educational institute.
Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain appearing for the revisionists argued that the district judge had “passed the impugned order without any basis” as it should have called for expert opinion from the ASI on whether carbon dating could be done without causing any harm.
Additional Advocate General MC Chaturvedi, assisted by Chief Standing Counsel Bipin Bihari Pandey, had appeared for the state government.
On November 4, 2022, the high court had sought the response of ASI in the matter and directed the ASI Director General to submit his opinion whether investigation of the said structure, if examined through carbon-dating, ground-penetrating radar (GPR), excavation and other methods adopted to determine its age, nature and other relevant information, is likely to damage it or a safe evaluation about its age can be done.
A suit was filed in the Varanasi District Court asserting rights to worship Maa Shringar Gauri and other deities which the petitioners said are situated inside the Gyanvapi complex.
On April 8, 2021, a Varanasi court was directed to conduct a comprehensive survey of Gyanvapi complex and during the survey the purported Shivling was found on 16 May 2022.
Demand for survey of entire Gyanvapi complex
A petition was also filed on May 16, seeking an Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) survey of the entire premises of the Gyanvapi complex, and not only the alleged Shivling as ordered by the Allahabad High Court.
The court has fixed May 22 for the next hearing in the case.
The court has also given time till May 19 to the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee to file objections to the fresh petition filed by the Hindu side.
(With agency inputs)
Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News,
India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
from Firstpost India Latest News https://ift.tt/HETjO38
No comments:
Post a Comment